is fashionable:
- "If we change the government privatize Telemadrid" Madrid
- not rule out the flotation of Canal de Isabel II
- Privatization of AENA and provide the State Lottery revenues of 14,000 million
- wish to deregulate and reduce the weight of the State a sector of the economy. So breaking monopolies that harm the private user theory of competitive improvements that market efficiency and competitiveness will be awarded. (TELEFONICA)
- deficit reduction to get rid of those segments of activity clearly indebted and not solvents. We argue that escape the market discipline of the results and services offered by them are poorer than their "cousins" of private court. (AENA AND LOTTERIES)
This is so neat and well of fine books and Adam Smith's house at the time of you, it becomes grotesque always horses in practice and even more in our beloved and worn bull hide. The reality is very different and has been exemplary delegitimized by the two major parties when they were in Moncloa.
and acronyms cases speak for themselves, current Telefonica Movi star was fed taxes for our parents decades of hardship and paid by the state monopoly enjoyed doing fatten their financial muscle to infinity and beyond. I was not in the red and was deficient in fact was so solvent that phagocytosed a few years all telecommunications companies and Latin American lusas he encountered. Enjoyed the facilities that we all pay for the benefit of a few. The service offering has not improved the richness of its IPO just led to the English Society and competition in the telephone, as you can read this link, which users could receive us and laugh when they moved to tears . IBERIA
as much of the same. Their aircraft and crew, as well as each and every one of the telephone poles and booths from the previous company, were paid salaries of our parents. was a public company so inefficient and so bad that when he joined British Airways recently gave birth to a world leader in aeronautical giant. Finished the year as one of the 10 most profitable stock market values \u200b\u200band insurance, 2010 ! And prices thanks to the efficiency of the private sector are popular!
as much of the same. Their aircraft and crew, as well as each and every one of the telephone poles and booths from the previous company, were paid salaries of our parents. was a public company so inefficient and so bad that when he joined British Airways recently gave birth to a world leader in aeronautical giant. Finished the year as one of the 10 most profitable stock market values \u200b\u200band insurance, 2010 ! And prices thanks to the efficiency of the private sector are popular!
:-( So the
final nothing at all and when you get rid of burdens "as unprofitable," as in the past Telefonica and Iberia, the present and future LOTTERIES RENFE or the Canal de Isabel II but of course you turn up the light, the snuff, gasoline and everything subible. Because they do not have income of your best companies in the war against the deficit and recession. More frivolous, it is as if Barcelona would say that Messi and Xavi and sacase not rent a bag and pass it to another foreign league, with the excuse that the team will be cheaper and competitive without them.
For example Who is in favor of the abolition of advertising on public channels if in return we have to go through with more tax to feed? It really is a concession to the private TV channels and pay among all when de la Renta. Or are we so naive to remove the ads and the TVE 2 has no cost in taxes?
Privatization is not the companies are unprofitable or inefficient quite the reverse is four dollars sold the winning horses of the Civil Service. The state monopoly is transformed into an oligopoly of three or four boards, in many cases foreign multinationals, they agree their prices openly. It benefits the privileged few making a lot of damage and missing the sacrifice of our parents who have paid with their decades of toil and sweat in the years to lead a private party few politicians and managers of the culture slicked pitch. For example Who is in favor of the abolition of advertising on public channels if in return we have to go through with more tax to feed? It really is a concession to the private TV channels and pay among all when de la Renta. Or are we so naive to remove the ads and the TVE 2 has no cost in taxes?
0 comments:
Post a Comment